Dynafit Tlt Speed Turn 20 at Binding Review
Dynafit TLT Expedition Review
Specialized, durable bindings for accomplished practitioners in serious, committed situations; be cognizant of the release compromises yous make
Price: $500 List | $499.95 at Backcountry
Compare prices at 2 resellers
Pros: Super potent, simple, calorie-free
Cons: No lateral heel release, no heel lifter pick, no adjustments
Manufacturer: Dynafit
Our Editors independently enquiry, test, and rate the best products. We only make coin if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more
Our Verdict
The name says information technology all. These bindings are literally made for the most serious and committing of ski expeditions. The Dynafit Trek is what you cull for skiing, where breaking equipment or coming out of the binding is the worst possible consequence. Roadside powder skiing at high speeds is non what these bindings are for; they essentially don't release. You ski deadening and in control, or your connective tissues endure for information technology.
Compare to Similar Products
| This Product | Atomic Backland Tour | Marker Alpinist 12 | G3 Ion LT 12 | Dynafit Speed Turn two.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awards |  | |  | ||
| Price | $499.95 at Backcountry Compare at 2 sellers | $439.99 at Amazon Compare at two sellers | $450 List $449.99 at Amazon | $429 Listing | Bank check Toll at Backcountry Compare at 2 sellers |
Overall Score | |||||
| Star Rating | |||||
| Pros | Super strong, simple, light | Light, solid, adjustable, iii heel lifts, good brakes | Light, innovative downhill performance | Solid, reliable ski bindings, splendid toe slice entry and like shooting fish in a barrel heel lifter transitions | Surprisingly durable for how lite they are, killer price, lighter than virtually |
| Cons | No lateral heel release, no heel lifter pick, no adjustments | No certification, express release adjustment | Unsophisticated heel lifters, untested aftermarket brake | No ski brake option, heavier than bindings with the same or more than features | No brake selection, heel risers are more than of a pain to learn |
| Bottom Line | Specialized, durable bindings for accomplished practitioners in serious, committed situations; be cognizant of the release compromises you make | This minimalist bounden has exactly what near of yous should want, and nothing you don't need | These are excellent all around functioning bindings made for human powered skiing | These Canadian bindings use a now-proven overall design and include the latest of the greatest usability benefits; we only wish they were lighter | A simple bounden design that has been proven over decades now, available for a fraction of the price of others |
| Rating Categories | Dynafit TLT Expedition | Atomic Backland Tour | Marker Alpinist 12 | G3 Ion LT 12 | Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0 |
| Touring Performance (30%) | |||||
| Downhill Operation (25%) | |||||
| Weight (25%) | |||||
| Ease Of Utilize (xv%) | |||||
| Durability (5%) | |||||
| Specs | Dynafit TLT Expedition | Atomic Backland Tour | Marker Alpinist 12 | G3 Ion LT 12 | Dynafit Speed Plow 2.0 |
| Weight (pounds for pair) | i.00 lbs | i.26 lbs | 1.18 lbs | two.13 lbs | 1.63 lbs |
| Weight of one binding, grams | 226g | 286g | 268g | 483g | 370g |
| Release value range | Unrated; vertical only at heel | "Men", "Women", "Proficient" | six to 12 | 5 to 12 | iv to 10 |
| Stack pinnacle (mm. boilerplate of toe and heel pin height) | 30mm | 37mm | 36mm | 46mm | 38mm |
| Toe/heel delta (mm deviation in height between heel pins and toe pins) | 3.5mm | 10mm | 3mm | 12.5mm | 17mm |
| Restriction options | No brakes | 80, 90, 100, 110, 120mm | 90, 105, 115mm | No brakes | No brakes |
| ISO/DIN Certified? | No | No | No | No | No |
| Ski Crampon uniform? | Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D way. | Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style. | Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D manner. | With aftermarket part. But G3 brand. | Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D fashion. |
Evidence full specification details Hibernate full specification details
Our Analysis and Test Results
This is the simplest, most robust AT binding we know of. Tech way bindings are known for simplicity. At that place are none simpler than the Dynafit Expedition. We can't think of a binding with fewer moving parts or a more than long-established pedigree. You cull this binding for lightweight, reliable simplicity. You don't choose it for ease of employ or prophylactic. This is a no-compromises selection.
Performance Comparison
The Dynafit Expedition is exactly what yous need for super remote, long trips similar this 2021 circuit into Washington'south Picket Range.
Credit: Jediah Porter
Touring Performance
Lightweight tech bindings are all rather like in touring performance. We await total range of motion at the toe. When this is lacking, we detect and annotate on information technology. The Trek has full range of motion. The smaller the binding, the less it will ice up and collect snow. Few are smaller than the Trek. Icing is minimal. Retentiveness at the toe pivot is as rigid as we know. A few bindings are more flexy or rattly at the toe pin. Not the Trek. Finally, let'southward talk about the heel riser situation on the Dynafit Trek. There is exactly 1 position. You tin take your heel in a low riser position while touring. Cypher else. Employ good skinning technique and modern touring boots with ample ankle mobility and this will non exist a problem. Be sloppy with your skinning or somehow limit your talocrural joint mobility, and you will suffer. Long, apartment approaches and exits are annoying with perma-lifted heels similar on the Expedition.
The simple, proven Dynafit Expedition binding. The exact toe piece appears elsewhere in the Dynafit line, but the no-pivot heel is what sets this production autonomously.
Credit: Jediah Porter
Downhill Performance
There are 2 primary components of downhill functioning in a tech binding. We look at safety release separate from retentiveness and performance. In terms of safety release, the Expedition is amongst the least sophisticated options on the marketplace. Beginning, there is no certification of the binding release. This is similar to pretty much any touring bindings that are acceptably chosen "lightweight". The toe releases like other basic tech bindings, and the heel releases vertically as well. There is absolutely no lateral release at the heel. To release at the heel, nigh lightweight tech binding heel pieces pivot out of the way. The Expedition heel does not pivot at all. We cannot call these "safe" backcountry ski bindings in terms of release characteristics. Know, though, that some of the best ski mountaineers use these verbal bindings for their reliability. Their safety comes from ski skill and conservative moves.
After release characteristics, we look at boot retentiveness during "normal" skiing. Mainly, this is a word of bounden geometry and elasticity. Due at to the lowest degree in office to its simplicity, the Trek has some of the most favorable geometry of any tested bindings. Nosotros measured the stack height to exist 30mm and the binding delta to be iii.5mm. Unlike reviewers and manufacturers measure binding geometry differently. We use the same method to measure all the bindings we test. With that, we can confidently assert that the Trek keeps your foot closer to the ski than any other binding nosotros know of. Farther, the difference between toe and heel is less than all just i award-winning binding. These are good things. In terms of binding elasticity, there is substantially none in the Dynafit Trek. Your boot is either in or out of the binding; aught in betwixt. That rigid connection is something that most skiers find to be undesirable. Once again, super loftier-cease ski mountaineers that we consult with really adopt the fully rigid connection. Your mileage may vary.
Ride piece of cake on the Dynafit Expedition and you will take a good time. Charge hard and yous risk your connective tissues.
Credit: Jediah Porter
Ease of Utilise
Simple bindings are easy bindings. If simply for the ease of controlling (y'all don't have a ton of features to dabble with and bandy between), we similar the Trek. When it comes to ski binding features, the "if you don't have information technology, y'all don't need it" maxim applies.
Testing the Dynafit Expedition in the Northern Tetons of Wyoming. Clean, fast transitions allow more skiing. More than skiing is proficient.
Credit: Jediah Porter
Weight
The Expedition is certainly our simplest binding. This makes it shut to our lightest binding. Structure is super robust, tipping the scales slightly heavier than a few options. 226g per foot is featherweight. The lightest bindings we would consider for day-to-day ski touring (aside from inbounds fitness skinning or skimo racing) are around 140 grams. The "typical" bindings you lot will probable be sold at most shops weigh effectually 400 grams or more. With this in mind, the Expedition is closer to super lite than it is to "average". This is good. In the end, these are lightweight bindings that optimize immovability and reliability.
On large trips you demand to comport your skis. When you need to carry your skis, y'all volition be glad when they are lite. Calorie-free bindings like the Expedition greatly enhance comport.
Credit: Jediah Porter
Durability
You lot choose these for durability. This is the simplest, about robust binding model we accept tested. As noted above, at that place are fewer moving parts than in even the lightest bindings in our test. The construction is super robust. The Expedition, as the branding should advise, is optimized for reliability in super remote, super committing situations. Yous compromise some role but are far more than likely to retain the office you get with this binding choice.
The Dynafit Trek and our lead exam editor in the Big Hole Mountains of eastern Idaho.
Credit: Rosie De Lise
Value
For every bit unproblematic as they are, the Expedition isn't super cheap. Y'all pay for the robust construction. You can spend a lot more, of course, on your ski bindings. But we can't call these a budget choice. Sure, they will final a long, long time. This is proficient. Through those years of high-volume skiing, y'all will compromise some safety and function, but you won't wear them out.
Robust skis and tiny bindings are a better way to achieve efficiency while maintaining ski operation than light skis and burly bindings. The Expedition is a calorie-free binding that can be used in this way, assuming you can stomach the release compromises.
Credit: Jediah Porter
Conclusion
You choose the Dynafit Expedition for trek skiing. They perform consistently and reliably and are the antithesis of "sophistication". They hold your kick when yous need it to; that's about information technology — and that'due south high praise.
— Jediah Porter
Source: https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/snow-sports/at-bindings/dynafit-tlt-expedition
0 Response to "Dynafit Tlt Speed Turn 20 at Binding Review"
Post a Comment